↓ Skip to main content

Myocardial Strain Using Cardiac MR Feature Tracking and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Myocardial Strain Using Cardiac MR Feature Tracking and Speckle Tracking Echocardiography in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Patients
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00246-017-1777-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryan Siegel, Laura Olivieri, Heather Gordish-Dressman, Christopher F. Spurney

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an inherited X-linked disorder with an incidence of 1 in 3500 male births, and cardiomyopathy is becoming the leading cause of death. While Cardiac MRI (CMR) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) are important tools in recognizing myocardial involvement, myocardial strain imaging may demonstrate early changes and allow patients to avoid gadolinium contrast. We performed CMR feature tracking (FT) and echo-based speckle tracking (STE) strain measures on DMD patients and age/sex matched controls who had received a CMR with contrast and transthoracic echocardiogram. Data were collected for longitudinal strain in the apical four-chamber view and circumferential strain in the mid-papillary parasternal short axis. Segmental wall analysis was performed and compared with the presence of LGE. Data were analyzed using student's t tests or one-way ANOVA adjusting for multiple comparisons. We measured 24 subjects with DMD and 8 controls. Thirteen of 24 DMD subjects were LGE positive only in the lateral segments in short-axis views. Average circumferential strain (CS) measured by FT was significantly decreased in DMD compared to controls (- 18.8 ± 6.1 vs. - 25.5 ± 3.2; p < 0.001) and showed significant differences in the anterolateral, inferolateral, and inferior segments. Average CS by STE trended towards significance (p = 0.06) but showed significance in only the inferior segment. FT showed significant differences in the inferolateral segment between LGE positive (- 15.5 ± 9.0) and LGE negative (- 18.2 ± 8.3) in DMD subjects compared to controls (- 28.6 ± 7.3; p ≤ 0.04). FT also showed significant differences between anteroseptal and inferolateral segments within LGE-positive (p < 0.003) and LGE-negative (p < 0.03) DMD subjects while STE did not. There were no significant differences in longitudinal strain measures. CMR-FT-derived myocardial strain was able to demonstrate differences between subjects with DMD and controls not detected by STE. FT was also able to demonstrate differences in LGE-positive and LGE-negative segments within patients with DMD. FT may be able to predict LGE-positive segments in DMD without the use of gadolinium contrast.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Computer Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#14,369,287
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#580
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,666
of 438,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#10
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.