| Title |
Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-017-1422-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John S. Woods, Mattia Damiani, Peter Fantke, Andrew D. Henderson, John M. Johnston, Jane Bare, Serenella Sala, Danielle Maia de Souza, Stephan Pfister, Leo Posthuma, Ralph K. Rosenbaum, Francesca Verones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Norway | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 33% |
| Engineering | 12 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 45 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,469,784
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#249
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,337
of 444,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.