↓ Skip to main content

Whatever the cost? Information integration in memory-based inferences depends on cognitive effort

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Whatever the cost? Information integration in memory-based inferences depends on cognitive effort
Published in
Memory & Cognition, December 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13421-014-0493-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin E. Hilbig, Martha Michalkiewicz, Marta Castela, Rüdiger F. Pohl, Edgar Erdfelder

Abstract

One of the most prominent models of probabilistic inferences from memory is the simple recognition heuristic (RH). The RH theory assumes that judgments are based on recognition in isolation, such that other information is ignored. However, some prior research has shown that available knowledge is not generally ignored. In line with the notion of adaptive strategy selection-and, thus, a trade-off between accuracy and effort-we hypothesized that information integration crucially depends on how easily accessible information beyond recognition is, how much confidence decision makers have in this information, and how (cognitively) costly it is to acquire it. In three experiments, we thus manipulated (a) the availability of information beyond recognition, (b) the subjective usefulness of this information, and (c) the cognitive costs associated with acquiring this information. In line with the predictions, we found that RH use decreased substantially, the more easily and confidently information beyond recognition could be integrated, and increased substantially with increasing cognitive costs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 35%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Computer Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,206,722
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#840
of 1,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,864
of 356,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.