↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of direct antiviral activity of the Deva-5 herb formulation and extracts of five Asian plants against influenza A virus H3N8

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of direct antiviral activity of the Deva-5 herb formulation and extracts of five Asian plants against influenza A virus H3N8
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Namsrai Oyuntsetseg, Maxim A Khasnatinov, Perenlei Molor-Erdene, Janchiv Oyunbileg, Aleksander V Liapunov, Galina A Danchinova, Sanduijav Oldokh, Jigden Baigalmaa, Chimedtseren Chimedragchaa

Abstract

The herb formulation Deva-5 is used in traditional medicine to treat acute infectious diseases. Deva-5 is composed of five herbs: Gentiana decumbens L., Momordica cochinchinensis L., Hypecoum erectum L., Polygonum bistorta L., and Terminalia chebula Retz. Deva-5 and its five components were investigated for in vitro antiviral activity against avian influenza A virus subtype H3N8.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mongolia 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 12%
Chemistry 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,312,760
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,037
of 3,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,396
of 225,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#59
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.