↓ Skip to main content

Wage subsidies and hiring chances for the disabled: some causal evidence

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 1,319)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Wage subsidies and hiring chances for the disabled: some causal evidence
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10198-014-0656-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stijn Baert

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of wage subsidies as a policy instrument to integrate disabled individuals into the labor market. To identify causal effects, a large-scale field experiment was conducted in Belgium. The results show that the likelihood of a disabled candidate receiving a positive response to a job application is not positively influenced by disclosing entitlement to the Flemish Supporting Subsidy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 20 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 20%
Psychology 11 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,403,086
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#45
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,155
of 366,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.