↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: New GOLD classification: longitudinal data on group assignment

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Erratum: New GOLD classification: longitudinal data on group assignment
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12931-014-0140-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ciro Casanova, Jose M Marin, Cristina Martinez-Gonzalez, Pilar de Lucas-Ramos, Isabel Mir-Viladrich, Borja Cosio, German Peces-Barba, Miryam Calle-Rubio, Ingrid Solanes-García, Ramón Agüero, Alfredo de Diego-Damia, Nuria Feu-Collado, Inmaculada Alfageme, Rosa Irigaray, Eva Balcells, Antonia Llunel, Juan Bautista Galdiz-Iturri, Margarita Marín, Juan José Soler, Jose Luis Lopez-Campos, Joan B Soriano, Juan P de-Torres

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 38%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2014.
All research outputs
#13,418,483
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#1,384
of 2,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,980
of 361,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#41
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.