↓ Skip to main content

Association between left atrial phasic conduit function and early atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Association between left atrial phasic conduit function and early atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00392-017-1188-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Degiovanni, Enrico Boggio, Eleonora Prenna, Chiara Sartori, Federica De Vecchi, Paolo N. Marino, From the Novara Atrial Fibrillation (NAIF) Study Group

Abstract

Diastolic dysfunction promotes atrial fibrillation (AF) inducing left atrial (LA) remodeling, with chamber dilation and fibrosis. Predominance of LA phasic conduit (LAC) function should reflect not only chamber alterations but also underlying left ventricular (LV) filling impairment. Thus, LAC was tested as possible predictor of early AF relapse after electrical cardioversion (EC). 96 consecutive patients, who underwent EC for persistent non-valvular AF, were prospectively enrolled. Immediately after successful EC (3 h ± 15 min), an echocardiographic apical four-chamber view was acquired with transmitral velocities, annular tissue Doppler and simultaneous LV and LA three-dimensional full-volume datasets. Then, from LA-LV volumetric curves we computed LAC as: [(LV maximum - LV minimum) - (LA maximum - LA minimum) volume], expressed as % LV stroke volume. LA pump, immediately post-EC, was assumed and verified as being negligible. Sinus rhythm persistence at 1 month was checked with ECG-Holter monitoring. At 1 month 62 patients were in sinus rhythm and 34 in AF. AF patients presented pre-EC higher E/é values (p = 0.012), no major LA volume differences (p = NS), but a stiffer LV cavity (p = 0.012) for a comparable LV capacitance (p = 0.461). Conduit contributed more (p < 0.001) to LV stroke volume in AF subpopulation. Multiple regression revealed LAC as the most significant AF predictor (p = 0.013), even after correction for biometric characteristics and pharmacotherapy (p = 0.008). Our data suggest that LAC larger contribution to LV filling soon after EC reflects LA-LV stiffening, which skews atrioventricular interaction leading to AF perpetuation and makes conduit dominance a powerful predictor of early AF recurrence.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Materials Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,333,694
of 24,135,931 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#582
of 886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,876
of 446,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,135,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.