| Title |
Recurrent rectal prolapse following primary surgical treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Surgery International, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00383-010-2565-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew S. Flum, Eustace S. Golladay, Daniel H. Teitelbaum |
| Abstract |
The management of recurrent rectal prolapse following initial surgical procedures remains unclear. We present a series of pediatric patients with rectal prolapse and describe their surgical management, and the subsequent care for those children developing recurrence. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 29% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 71% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Design | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2014.
All research outputs
#5,876,272
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#124
of 1,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,644
of 93,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,251 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.