↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Housing Type and Housing Quality in Urban Children with Asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Housing Type and Housing Quality in Urban Children with Asthma
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11524-009-9404-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Northridge, Olivia F. Ramirez, Jeanette A. Stingone, Luz Claudio

Abstract

The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between type and quality of housing and childhood asthma in an urban community with a wide gradient of racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and housing characteristics. A parent-report questionnaire was distributed in 26 randomly selected New York City public elementary schools. Type of housing was categorized using the participants' addresses and the Building Information System, a publicly-accessible database from the New York City Department of Buildings. Type of housing was associated with childhood asthma with the highest prevalence of asthma found in public housing (21.8%). Residents of all types of private housing had lower odds of asthma than children living in public housing. After adjusting for individual- and community-level demographic and economic factors, the relationship between housing type and childhood asthma persisted, with residents of private family homes having the lowest odds of current asthma when compared to residents of public housing (odds ratio: 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.22, 1.21). Factors associated with housing quality explain some of the clustering of asthma in public housing. For example, the majority (68.7%) of public housing residents reported the presence of cockroaches, compared to 21% of residents of private houses. Reported cockroaches, rats, and water leaks were also independently associated with current asthma. These findings suggest differential exposure and asthma risk by urban housing type. Interventions aimed at reducing these disparities should consider multiple aspects of the home environment, especially those that are not directly controlled by residents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Social Sciences 28 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 12%
Environmental Science 16 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 45 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#691,297
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#112
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,577
of 164,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.