↓ Skip to main content

No detectable impact of small-scale disturbances on ‘blue carbon’ within seagrass beds

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
No detectable impact of small-scale disturbances on ‘blue carbon’ within seagrass beds
Published in
Marine Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00227-014-2558-8
Authors

Peter I. Macreadie, Paul H. York, Craig D. H. Sherman, Michael J. Keough, D. Jeff Ross, Aurora M. Ricart, Timothy M. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 36%
Environmental Science 42 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,514,208
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#872
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,510
of 261,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.