Title |
Low-dose intrathecal local anesthetic does not increase the threshold current for the epidural stimulation test: a prospective observational trial of neuraxial analgesia in labouring women
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12630-014-0291-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jose C. A. Carvalho, Rakhi Khemka, Julian Loke, Ban C. H. Tsui |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of the electrical epidural stimulation test (EST) to determine the position of the epidural catheter during combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia for labour analgesia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 45% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,319
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,113
of 368,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#46
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.