| Title |
Can Phone-Based Motivational Interviewing Improve Medication Adherence to Antiplatelet Medications After a Coronary Stent Among Racial Minorities? A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3139-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana M. Palacio, Claudia Uribe, Leslie Hazel-Fernandez, Hua Li, Leonardo J. Tamariz, Sylvia D. Garay, Olveen Carrasquillo |
| Abstract |
Minorities have lower adherence to cardiovascular medications and have worst cardiovascular outcomes post coronary stent placement OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of phone-delivered Motivational Interviewing (MINT) to an educational video at improving adherence to antiplatelet medications among insured minorities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 26% |
| Psychology | 13 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2014.
All research outputs
#19,440,618
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,622
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,026
of 361,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#104
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.