↓ Skip to main content

A RFID Specific Participatory Design Approach to Support Design and Implementation of Real-Time Location Systems in the Operating Room

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
A RFID Specific Participatory Design Approach to Support Design and Implementation of Real-Time Location Systems in the Operating Room
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10916-014-0168-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. C. P. Guédon, L. S. G. L. Wauben, D. F. de Korne, M. Overvelde, J. Dankelman, J. J. van den Dobbelsteen

Abstract

Information technology, such as real-time location (RTL) systems using Radio Frequency IDentification (RFID) may contribute to overcome patient safety issues and high costs in healthcare. The aim of this work is to study if a RFID specific Participatory Design (PD) approach supports the design and the implementation of RTL systems in the Operating Room (OR). A RFID specific PD approach was used to design and implement two RFID based modules. The Device Module monitors the safety status of OR devices and the Patient Module tracks the patients' locations during their hospital stay. The PD principles 'multidisciplinary team', 'participation users (active involvement)' and 'early adopters' were used to include users from the RFID company, the university and the hospital. The design and implementation process consisted of two 'structured cycles' ('iterations'). The effectiveness of this approach was assessed by the acceptance in terms of level of use, continuity of the project and purchase. The Device Module included eight strategic and twelve tactical actions and the Patient Module included six strategic and twelve tactical actions. Both modules are now used on a daily basis and are purchased by the hospitals for continued use. The RFID specific PD approach was effective in guiding and supporting the design and implementation process of RFID technology in the OR. The multidisciplinary teams and their active participation provided insights in the social and the organizational context of the hospitals making it possible to better fit the technology to the hospitals' (future) needs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Engineering 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Computer Science 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,246,428
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#993
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,516
of 354,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.