| Title |
Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-013-0550-8 |
| Authors |
Jaimie T. A. Dick, Mhairi E. Alexander, Jonathan M. Jeschke, Anthony Ricciardi, Hugh J. MacIsaac, Tamara B. Robinson, Sabrina Kumschick, Olaf L. F. Weyl, Alison M. Dunn, Melanie J. Hatcher, Rachel A. Paterson, Keith D. Farnsworth, David M. Richardson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 5 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 379 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 21% |
| Researcher | 74 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 15% |
| Unknown | 42 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 223 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 102 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#6,782,985
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,053
of 2,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,357
of 203,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.