↓ Skip to main content

Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
61 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
299 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
686 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changing bodies changes minds: owning another body affects social cognition
Published in
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Maister, Mel Slater, Maria V. Sanchez-Vives, Manos Tsakiris

Abstract

Research on stereotypes demonstrates how existing prejudice affects the way we process outgroups. Recent studies have considered whether it is possible to change our implicit social bias by experimentally changing the relationship between the self and outgroups. In a number of experimental studies, participants have been exposed to bodily illusions that induced ownership over a body different to their own with respect to gender, age, or race. Ownership of an outgroup body has been found to be associated with a significant reduction in implicit biases against that outgroup. We propose that these changes occur via a process of self association that first takes place in the physical, bodily domain as an increase in perceived physical similarity between self and outgroup member. This self association then extends to the conceptual domain, leading to a generalization of positive self-like associations to the outgroup.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 686 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 <1%
United States 6 <1%
Portugal 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 655 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 137 20%
Student > Master 116 17%
Researcher 101 15%
Student > Bachelor 85 12%
Professor 35 5%
Other 110 16%
Unknown 102 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 256 37%
Computer Science 67 10%
Neuroscience 64 9%
Social Sciences 41 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 3%
Other 101 15%
Unknown 137 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#156,765
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#65
of 2,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,544
of 364,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.