↓ Skip to main content

Punica granatum Heuristic Treatment for Diabetes Mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medicinal Food, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Punica granatum Heuristic Treatment for Diabetes Mellitus
Published in
Journal of Medicinal Food, June 2007
DOI 10.1089/jmf.2006.290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Rachel Katz, Robert A. Newman, Ephraim Philip Lansky

Abstract

The current diabetes epidemic is a global concern with readily available effective therapies or preventative measures in demand. One natural product with such potential is the pomegranate (Punica granatum), with hypoglycemic activity noted from its flowers, seeds, and juice in canons of the traditional folk medicines of India. The mechanisms for such effects are largely unknown, though recent research suggests pomegranate flowers and juice may prevent diabetic sequelae via peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma binding and nitric oxide production. Pomegranate compounds associated with antidiabetic effects include oleanolic, ursolic, and gallic acids. Pomegranate fractions and their active compounds hold potential and are worthy of further investigations as safe and effective medical treatments for diabetes mellitus and its pathological consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 28 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,782,985
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medicinal Food
#600
of 1,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,538
of 70,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medicinal Food
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.