↓ Skip to main content

Age-related Changes in the Brain of the Dog

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Pathology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
11 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age-related Changes in the Brain of the Dog
Published in
Veterinary Pathology, June 2016
DOI 10.1354/vp.36-3-202
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Borràs, I. Ferrer, M. Pumarola

Abstract

Although many age-related changes have been described in the nervous system of different species, few authors have specifically studied the topic. Knowledge of such changes is essential to veterinary pathologists, who must distinguish the lesions of specific pathologic processes from those arising as a result of normal aging. The brains of 20 old dogs, ranging in age from 8 to 18 years, were compared with those of 10 young dogs using routine staining techniques (hematoxilin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff), special staining techniques (periodic acid-methenamine silver stain), and immunohistochemical techniques to detect glial fibrillary acid protein, neurofilaments, ubiquitin, and beta-amyloid. Changes affected meninges and choroid plexuses, meningeal and parenchymal vessels, neurons, and glial cells. Of special interest was the presence of polyglucosan bodies, cerebrovascular amyloid deposition, senile plaques, and ubiquitinated bodies. Some of the age-related changes found, particularly lipofuscin, polyglucosan bodies, and beta-amyloid protein deposition, may play a role in the pathogenesis of the canine cognitive dysfunction syndrome. The dog could be used as a natural animal model for the study of normal aging and human neurodegenerative diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Austria 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 27 16%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 15 9%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 59 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 14%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 36 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,449,539
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Pathology
#379
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,863
of 351,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Pathology
#128
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.