| Title |
Reproductive Characters and Mating Behaviour of Wild Nomascus hainanus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10764-008-9272-7 |
| Authors |
Jiang Zhou, Fuwen Wei, Ming Li, Chan Bosco Pui Lok, Deli Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,548,393
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#96
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,858
of 81,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them