| Title |
Web-Based Assessment of Outcomes After Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A New Patient Centered Option for Outcomes Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurocritical Care, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12028-014-0098-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew M. Naidech, Jennifer L. Beaumont, Michael Berman, Eric Liotta, Matthew B. Maas, Shyam Prabhakaran, Konrad Kording, Jane Holl, David Cella |
| Abstract |
Clinical outcomes are typically assessed by trained staff. We tested the hypothesis that outcomes reported by the patient or a caregiver on the web would be correlated with a validated interview. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 57% |
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,846,160
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Neurocritical Care
#339
of 1,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,362
of 358,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurocritical Care
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.