↓ Skip to main content

Unconventional colour vision

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unconventional colour vision
Published in
Current Biology, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Marshall, Kentaro Arikawa

Abstract

Colour vision in humans is 'middling' at best, both figuratively and literally in the animal visible spectrum of 300-750 nm. This comes as a surprise to many of us as we cannot imagine the need to see more colours than the millions we can manage. The fact is that many animals have colour vision that exceeds our red-green-blue (RGB)-based trichromacy. Birds and reptiles, along with several freshwater fish, have four colour receptors, for example, extending both ends of the human visible spectrum (400-700 nm), and may be termed tetrachromats. Horses, dogs, some primates and barracuda, on the other hand, have only two spectral classes of photoreceptors, and may be likened to red-green colour blind humans in performance; they are dichromats. Some animal groups, including insects, smaller fish, most birds and even mice make use of the ultraviolet (UV), a part of the spectrum we avoid, while others may see the spectrum that we have available to us but in more detail (Figure 1). The past two decades have also revealed animals with the potential for 'penta'-chromacy and beyond. Stomatopods (mantis shrimp) and butterflies possess up to twelve spectral sensitivities in their eyes and our mind boggles at the potential for 'dodeca'-chromatic colour space. How does a shrimp's brain decode a twelve-dimensional colour space, if indeed it does? Do butterflies require a higher level of colour vision to interpret the information of colours their wings seem to contain? Are we missing something?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 203 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 19 9%
Professor 9 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 40%
Neuroscience 21 10%
Environmental Science 11 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 48 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,320,875
of 25,845,749 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#5,081
of 14,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,836
of 373,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#78
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,845,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.