↓ Skip to main content

Phage display screening without repetitious selection rounds

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Biochemistry, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phage display screening without repetitious selection rounds
Published in
Analytical Biochemistry, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.ab.2011.11.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter A.C. ’t Hoen, Silvana M.G. Jirka, Bradley R. ten Broeke, Erik A. Schultes, Begoña Aguilera, Kar Him Pang, Hans Heemskerk, Annemieke Aartsma-Rus, Gertjan J. van Ommen, Johan T. den Dunnen

Abstract

Phage display screenings are frequently employed to identify high-affinity peptides or antibodies. Although successful, phage display is a laborious technology and is notorious for identification of false positive hits. To accelerate and improve the selection process, we have employed Illumina next generation sequencing to deeply characterize the Ph.D.-7 M13 peptide phage display library before and after several rounds of biopanning on KS483 osteoblast cells. Sequencing of the naive library after one round of amplification in bacteria identifies propagation advantage as an important source of false positive hits. Most important, our data show that deep sequencing of the phage pool after a first round of biopanning is already sufficient to identify positive phages. Whereas traditional sequencing of a limited number of clones after one or two rounds of selection is uninformative, the required additional rounds of biopanning are associated with the risk of losing promising clones propagating slower than nonbinding phages. Confocal and live cell imaging confirms that our screen successfully selected a peptide with very high binding and uptake in osteoblasts. We conclude that next generation sequencing can significantly empower phage display screenings by accelerating the finding of specific binders and restraining the number of false positive hits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 323 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 26%
Researcher 75 22%
Student > Master 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 20 6%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 45 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 26%
Chemistry 19 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 51 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,760,001
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Biochemistry
#129
of 8,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,430
of 153,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Biochemistry
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.