↓ Skip to main content

Why is obesity such a problem in the 21st century? The intersection of palatable food, cues and reward pathways, stress, and cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 4,284)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
45 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
79 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
633 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why is obesity such a problem in the 21st century? The intersection of palatable food, cues and reward pathways, stress, and cognition
Published in
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret J. Morris, Jessica E. Beilharz, Jayanthi Maniam, Amy C. Reichelt, R. Frederick Westbrook

Abstract

Changes in food composition and availability have contributed to the dramatic increase in obesity over the past 30-40 years in developed and, increasingly, in developing countries. The brain plays a critical role in regulating energy balance. Some human studies have demonstrated increased preference for high fat and high sugar foods in people reporting greater stress exposure. We have examined neurochemical changes in the brain in rodent models during the development of obesity, including the impact of obesity on cognition, reward neurocircuitry and stress responsiveness. Using supermarket foods high in fat and sugar, we showed that such a diet leads to changes in neurotransmitters involved in the hedonic appraisal of foods, indicative of an addiction-like capacity of foods high in fat and/or sugar. Importantly, withdrawal of the palatable diet led to a stress-like response. Furthermore, access to this palatable diet attenuated the physiological effects of acute stress (restraint), indicating that it could act as a comfort food. In more chronic studies, the diet also attenuated anxiety-like behavior in rats exposed to stress (maternal separation) early in life, but these rats may suffer greater metabolic harm than rats exposed to the early life stressor but not provided with the palatable diet. Impairments in cognitive function have been associated with obesity in both people and rodents. However, as little as 1 week of exposure to a high fat, high sugar diet selectively impaired place but not object recognition memory in the rat. Excess sugar alone had similar effects, and both diets were linked to increased inflammatory markers in the hippocampus, a critical region involved in memory. Obesity-related inflammatory changes have been found in the human brain. Ongoing work examines interventions to prevent or reverse diet-induced cognitive impairments. These data have implications for minimizing harm caused by unhealthy eating.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 633 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 619 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 17%
Student > Master 96 15%
Researcher 59 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 83 13%
Unknown 136 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 134 21%
Neuroscience 72 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 8%
Other 98 15%
Unknown 158 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 409. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#72,291
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#26
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#661
of 368,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.