You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Post‐tonsillectomy haemorrhage rates are related to technique for dissection and for haemostasis. An analysis of 15734 patients in the National Tonsil Surgery Register in Sweden
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/coa.12361 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A-C Hessén Söderman, E Odhagen, E Ericsson, C Hemlin, E Hultcrantz, O Sunnergren, J Stalfors |
| Abstract |
To analyse post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage (PTH) rates related to technique for dissection and haemostasis. STUDY DESIGN: REGISTER STUDY FROM THE NATIONAL TONSIL SURGERY REGISTER IN SWEDEN (NTSRS): METHODS: All patients, subjected to tonsillectomy (TE) without adenoidectomy 1st March 2009 - 26th April 2013 were included in the study. The surgeon reports data about technique and early PTH, while late PTH is reported by the patient in a questionnaire 30 days after surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences
#261
of 1,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,502
of 282,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,687 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.