↓ Skip to main content

Learning from Colleagues about Healthcare IT Implementation and Optimization: Lessons from a Medical Informatics Listserv

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Systems, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Learning from Colleagues about Healthcare IT Implementation and Optimization: Lessons from a Medical Informatics Listserv
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10916-014-0157-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martha B. Adams, Bonnie Kaplan, Heather J. Sobko, Craig Kuziemsky, Kourosh Ravvaz, Ross Koppel

Abstract

Communication among medical informatics communities can suffer from fragmentation across multiple forums, disciplines, and subdisciplines; variation among journals, vocabularies and ontologies; cost and distance. Online communities help overcome these obstacles, but may become onerous when listservs are flooded with cross-postings. Rich and relevant content may be ignored. The American Medical Informatics Association successfully addressed these problems when it created a virtual meeting place by merging the membership of four working groups into a single listserv known as the "Implementation and Optimization Forum." A communication explosion ensued, with thousands of interchanges, hundreds of topics, commentaries from "notables," neophytes, and students - many from different disciplines, countries, traditions. We discuss the listserv's creation, illustrate its benefits, and examine its lessons for others. We use examples from the lively, creative, deep, and occasionally conflicting discussions of user experiences - interchanges about medication reconciliation, open source strategies, nursing, ethics, system integration, and patient photos in the EMR - all enhancing knowledge, collegiality, and collaboration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Computer Science 7 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,026,170
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#204
of 1,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,285
of 361,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,143 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.