↓ Skip to main content

The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
299 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, June 2001
DOI 10.1007/s002650100338
Authors

Rebecca Bliege Bird, Eric Smith, Douglas W. Bird

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Argentina 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 360 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 27%
Researcher 66 17%
Student > Master 49 12%
Student > Bachelor 43 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 76 19%
Unknown 37 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 111 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 24%
Psychology 45 11%
Arts and Humanities 23 6%
Environmental Science 18 5%
Other 57 14%
Unknown 49 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,459
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,149
of 41,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.