| Title |
Interference of aromatic sulfo groups in the microbial degradation of the azo dyes Orange I and Orange II
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, August 1983
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00419473 |
| Authors |
Hans G. Kulla, Franziska Klausener, Ulrich Meyer, Barbara Lüdeke, Thomas Leisinger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 19% |
| Engineering | 7 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,475,490
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#45
of 3,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235
of 7,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.