↓ Skip to main content

Equilibrium phase diagram of a randomly pinned glass-former

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Equilibrium phase diagram of a randomly pinned glass-former
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1500730112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Misaki Ozawa, Walter Kob, Atsushi Ikeda, Kunimasa Miyazaki

Abstract

We use computer simulations to study the thermodynamic properties of a glass-former in which a fraction c of the particles has been permanently frozen. By thermodynamic integration, we determine the Kauzmann, or ideal glass transition, temperature TK(c) at which the configurational entropy vanishes. This is done without resorting to any kind of extrapolation, i.e., TK(c) is indeed an equilibrium property of the system. We also measure the distribution function of the overlap, i.e., the order parameter that signals the glass state. We find that the transition line obtained from the overlap coincides with that obtained from the thermodynamic integration, thus showing that the two approaches give the same transition line. Finally, we determine the geometrical properties of the potential energy landscape, notably the T- and c dependence of the saddle index, and use these properties to obtain the dynamic transition temperature Td(c). The two temperatures TK(c) and Td(c) cross at a finite value of c and indicate the point at which the glass transition line ends. These findings are qualitatively consistent with the scenario proposed by the random first-order transition theory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
Vietnam 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 69 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Researcher 18 24%
Professor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 39 51%
Chemistry 7 9%
Materials Science 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Chemical Engineering 3 4%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,034,172
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#96,932
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,197
of 269,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#848
of 925 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 925 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.