↓ Skip to main content

Benefits of resistance training in physically frail elderly: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,868)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
153 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
765 Mendeley
Title
Benefits of resistance training in physically frail elderly: a systematic review
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40520-017-0863-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Lopez, Ronei Silveira Pinto, Regis Radaelli, Anderson Rech, Rafael Grazioli, Mikel Izquierdo, Eduardo Lusa Cadore

Abstract

Exercise is one of the most important components in frailty prevention and treatment. Therefore, we systematically reviewed the effect of resistance training (RT) alone or combined with multimodal exercise intervention on muscle hypertrophy, maximal strength, power output, functional performance, and falls incidence in physically frail elderly. MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from 2005 to 2017. Studies must have mentioned the effects of RT (i.e., included or not in multimodal training) on at least one of the following parameters: muscle mass, muscle strength, muscle power, functional capacity, and risk of falls in frail elderly. The initial search identified 371 studies and 16 were used for qualitative analysis for describing the effect of strength training performed alone or in a multimodal exercise intervention. We observed that RT alone or in a multimodal training may induce increases of 6.6-37% in maximal strength; 3.4-7.5% in muscle mass, 8.2% in muscle power, 4.7-58.1% in functional capacity and risk of falls, although some studies did not show enhancements. Frequency of 1-6 sessions per week, training volume of 1-3 sets of 6-15 repetitions and intensity of 30-70%1-RM promoted significant enhancements on muscle strength, muscle power, and functional outcomes. Therefore, in agreement with previous studies, we suggest that supervised and controlled RT represents an effective intervention in frailty treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 765 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 765 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 117 15%
Student > Master 116 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 8%
Researcher 38 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 4%
Other 111 15%
Unknown 290 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 156 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 110 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 88 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 1%
Other 65 8%
Unknown 324 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#300,403
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#15
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,652
of 446,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.