| Title |
Description and validation of a two-step analogue/regression downscaling method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00704-013-0836-x |
| Authors |
J. Ribalaygua, L. Torres, J. Pórtoles, R. Monjo, E. Gaitán, M. R. Pino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 18% |
| Engineering | 11 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#1,155
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,806
of 294,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Climatology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.