| Title |
From international health to global health: how to foster a better dialogue between empirical and normative disciplines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12914-014-0036-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gorik Ooms |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| Belgium | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 20% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 38% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,354,398
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,547
of 17,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,583
of 363,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#25
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.