↓ Skip to main content

Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche distributions recorded in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche distributions recorded in vivo
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-10-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viola Priesemann, Matthias HJ Munk, Michael Wibral

Abstract

Many systems in nature are characterized by complex behaviour where large cascades of events, or avalanches, unpredictably alternate with periods of little activity. Snow avalanches are an example. Often the size distribution f(s) of a system's avalanches follows a power law, and the branching parameter sigma, the average number of events triggered by a single preceding event, is unity. A power law for f(s), and sigma = 1, are hallmark features of self-organized critical (SOC) systems, and both have been found for neuronal activity in vitro. Therefore, and since SOC systems and neuronal activity both show large variability, long-term stability and memory capabilities, SOC has been proposed to govern neuronal dynamics in vivo. Testing this hypothesis is difficult because neuronal activity is spatially or temporally subsampled, while theories of SOC systems assume full sampling. To close this gap, we investigated how subsampling affects f(s) and sigma by imposing subsampling on three different SOC models. We then compared f(s) and sigma of the subsampled models with those of multielectrode local field potential (LFP) activity recorded in three macaque monkeys performing a short term memory task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
France 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 109 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 29%
Researcher 29 24%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 26 22%
Neuroscience 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Mathematics 8 7%
Computer Science 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,246,428
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#1,053
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,051
of 92,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.