You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lynch Syndrome Caused by Germline PMS2 Mutations: Delineating the Cancer Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2014.57.8088 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanne W ten Broeke, Richard M Brohet, Carli M Tops, Heleen M van der Klift, Mary E Velthuizen, Inge Bernstein, Gabriel Capellá Munar, Encarna Gomez Garcia, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Tom G W Letteboer, Fred H Menko, Annika Lindblom, Arjen R Mensenkamp, Pal Moller, Theo A van Os, Nils Rahner, Bert J W Redeker, Rolf H Sijmons, Liesbeth Spruijt, Manon Suerink, Yvonne J Vos, Anja Wagner, Frederik J Hes, Hans F Vasen, Maartje Nielsen, Juul T Wijnen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,519,830
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#5,877
of 22,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,042
of 366,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#95
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.