You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Burden of disability due to musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.berh.2014.08.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lyn March, Emma U.R. Smith, Damian G. Hoy, Marita J. Cross, Lidia Sanchez-Riera, Fiona Blyth, Rachelle Buchbinder, Theo Vos, Anthony D. Woolf |
| Abstract |
This chapter summarises the global and regional prevalence, disability (Years Lived with Disability (YLDs)) and overall burden (Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs)) and costs for the common musculoskeletal disorders including low back and neck pain, hip and knee osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, and a remaining combined group of other MSK conditions. The contribution of the role of pain in disability burden is introduced. Trends over time and predictions of increasing MSK disability with demographic changes are addressed and the particular challenges facing the developing world are highlighted. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 510 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 103 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 12% |
| Researcher | 52 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 101 | 19% |
| Unknown | 115 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 17% |
| Engineering | 37 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 81 | 16% |
| Unknown | 141 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,629,765
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
#110
of 835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,821
of 373,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.