↓ Skip to main content

Unanswered clinical questions in the management of cardiometabolic risk in the elderly: a statement of the Spanish society of internal medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Unanswered clinical questions in the management of cardiometabolic risk in the elderly: a statement of the Spanish society of internal medicine
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-14-193
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas, Vicente Giner-Galvañ, José M Mostaza, José I Cuende, Jose M de Miguel-Yanes, Eduardo Rovira, Demetrio Sánchez-Fuentes, Carmen Suárez Fernández, Pilar Román Sánchez, the SEMI Working Group

Abstract

Despite the progressive increase in life expectancy and the relationship between aging with multi-morbidities and the increased use of healthcare resources, current clinical practice guidelines (CPG) on cardiometabolic risk cannot be adequately applied to elderly subjects with multiple chronic conditions. Its management frequently becomes complicated by both, an excessive use of medications that may lead to overtreatment, drug interactions and increased toxicity, and errors in dosage and non-compliance. Concerned by this gap, the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine created a group of independent experts on cardiometabolic risk who discussed what they considered to be unanswered questions in the management of elderly patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 22 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Psychology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 25 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,326,409
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#310
of 1,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,721
of 353,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.