↓ Skip to main content

Hyperagency and the Good Life – Does Extreme Enhancement Threaten Meaning?

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Hyperagency and the Good Life – Does Extreme Enhancement Threaten Meaning?
Published in
Neuroethics, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12152-013-9200-1
Authors

John Danaher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 7 23%
Psychology 4 13%
Arts and Humanities 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,386,678
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#399
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,271
of 307,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.