↓ Skip to main content

Deinococcusradioresistens sp. nov., a UV and gamma radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from mountain soil

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Deinococcusradioresistens sp. nov., a UV and gamma radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from mountain soil
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10482-014-0350-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sathiyaraj Srinivasan, Jae-Jin Lee, Sang-Yong Lim, Min-Ho Joe, Seong-Hun Im, Myung Kyum Kim

Abstract

Two Gram-negative, non-motile, short rod-shaped bacterial strains, designated as 8A(T) and 28A, were isolated from Mount Deogyusan, Jeonbuk Province, South Korea. The isolates were analyzed by a polyphasic approach, revealing variations in their phenotypic characters but high DNA-DNA hybridisation values reciprocally, confirming that they belong to the same species. Both the isolates also showed a high resistance to UV compared with Deinococcus radiodurans, and a gamma-radiation resistance similar to other members of the genus Deinococcus. Phylogenetic analysis with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of closely related species indicated their similarities were below 97 %. Chemotaxonomic data showed the most abundant fatty acids to be C16:1ω7c and C16:0. The strains can be distinguished from closely related species by the production of esterase (C4) and α-galactosidase, and by their ability to assimilate L-alanine, L-histidine and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Based on the phenotypic, phylogenetic, and chemotaxonomic data, the isolates represent a novel species of the genus Deinococcus, for which the name Deinococcus radioresistens sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 8A(T) (KEMB 9004-109(T) = JCM 19777(T)), and a second strain is 28A (KEMB 9004-113 = JCM 19778).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 5%
Tunisia 1 5%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#14,144,322
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,287
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,224
of 331,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#33
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.