↓ Skip to main content

Beneficial effects of melatonin in a rat model of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Biogerontology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Beneficial effects of melatonin in a rat model of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Biogerontology, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10522-014-9547-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ekaterina A. Rudnitskaya, Kseniya Yi. Maksimova, Natalia A. Muraleva, Sergey V. Logvinov, Lyudmila V. Yanshole, Nataliya G. Kolosova, Natalia A. Stefanova

Abstract

Melatonin synthesis is disordered in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). To determine the role of melatonin in the pathogenesis of AD, suitable animal models are needed. The OXYS rats are an experimental model of accelerated senescence that has also been proposed as a spontaneous rat model of AD-like pathology. In the present study, we demonstrate that disturbances in melatonin secretion occur in OXYS rats at 4 months of age. These disturbances occur simultaneously with manifestation of behavioral abnormalities against the background of neurodegeneration and alterations in hormonal status but before the signs of amyloid-β accumulation. We examined whether oral administration of melatonin could normalize the melatonin secretion and have beneficial effects on OXYS rats before progression to AD-like pathology. The results showed that melatonin treatment restored melatonin secretion in the pineal gland of OXYS rats as well as the serum levels of growth hormone and IGF-1, the level of BDNF in the hippocampus and the healthy state of hippocampal neurons. Additionally, melatonin treatment of OXYS rats prevented an increase in anxiety and the decline of locomotor activity, of exploratory activity, and of reference memory. Thus, melatonin may be involved in AD progression, whereas oral administration of melatonin could be a prophylactic strategy to prevent or slow down the progression of some features of AD pathology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 19 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,246,428
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Biogerontology
#558
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,384
of 331,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogerontology
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.