You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1411587 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olvert A. Berkhemer, Puck S.S. Fransen, Debbie Beumer, Lucie A. van den Berg, Hester F. Lingsma, Albert J. Yoo, Wouter J. Schonewille, Jan Albert Vos, Paul J. Nederkoorn, Marieke J.H. Wermer, Marianne A.A. van Walderveen, Julie Staals, Jeannette Hofmeijer, Jacques A. van Oostayen, Geert J. Lycklama à Nijeholt, Jelis Boiten, Patrick A. Brouwer, Bart J. Emmer, Sebastiaan F. de Bruijn, Lukas C. van Dijk, L. Jaap Kappelle, Rob H. Lo, Ewoud J. van Dijk, Joost de Vries, Paul L.M. de Kort, Willem Jan J. van Rooij, Jan S.P. van den Berg, Boudewijn A.A.M. van Hasselt, Leo A.M. Aerden, René J. Dallinga, Marieke C. Visser, Joseph C.J. Bot, Patrick C. Vroomen, Omid Eshghi, Tobien H.C.M.L. Schreuder, Roel J.J. Heijboer, Koos Keizer, Alexander V. Tielbeek, Heleen M. den Hertog, Dick G. Gerrits, Renske M. van den Berg-Vos, Giorgos B. Karas, Ewout W. Steyerberg, H. Zwenneke Flach, Henk A. Marquering, Marieke E.S. Sprengers, Sjoerd F.M. Jenniskens, Ludo F.M. Beenen, René van den Berg, Peter J. Koudstaal, Wim H. van Zwam, Yvo B.W.E.M. Roos, Aad van der Lugt, Robert J. van Oostenbrugge, Charles B.L.M. Majoie, Diederik W.J. Dippel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 229 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 9% |
| Australia | 14 | 6% |
| Spain | 11 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Japan | 5 | 2% |
| Argentina | 5 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 157 | 69% |
| Scientists | 35 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,703 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Japan | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2650 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 410 | 15% |
| Other | 322 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 251 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 242 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 223 | 8% |
| Other | 682 | 25% |
| Unknown | 573 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1321 | 49% |
| Neuroscience | 236 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 3% |
| Engineering | 77 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 2% |
| Other | 246 | 9% |
| Unknown | 700 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 568. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#42,475
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,503
of 32,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324
of 349,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.