↓ Skip to main content

Meteoritic evidence for a previously unrecognized hydrogen reservoir on Mars

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meteoritic evidence for a previously unrecognized hydrogen reservoir on Mars
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.11.022
Authors

Tomohiro Usui, Conel M. O'D. Alexander, Jianhua Wang, Justin I. Simon, John H. Jones

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Kazakhstan 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 18 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 49%
Physics and Astronomy 9 10%
Chemistry 4 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2020.
All research outputs
#774,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#244
of 5,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,787
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#4
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.