↓ Skip to main content

An Exploratory Study of “Selfitis” and the Development of the Selfitis Behavior Scale

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,111)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
195 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
170 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An Exploratory Study of “Selfitis” and the Development of the Selfitis Behavior Scale
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11469-017-9844-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janarthanan Balakrishnan, Mark D. Griffiths

Abstract

In 2014, stories appeared in national and international media claiming that the condition of "selfitis" (the obsessive taking of selfies) was to be classed as a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association and that the condition could be borderline, acute, or chronic. However, the stories were a hoax but this did not stop empirical research being carried out into the concept. The present study empirically explored the concept and collected data on the existence of selfitis with respect to the three alleged levels (borderline, acute, and chronic) and developed the Selfitis Behavior Scale (SBS). Initially, focus group interviews with 225 Indian university students were carried out to generate potential items for the SBS. The SBS was then validated using 400 Indian university students via exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Six factors were identified in the EFA comprising environmental enhancement, social competition, attention seeking, mood modification, self-confidence, and social conformity. The findings demonstrate that the SBS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing selfitis but that confirmatory studies are needed to validate the concept more rigorously.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 170 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 13%
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 9 4%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 82 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 20%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Arts and Humanities 8 4%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 90 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1700. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,371
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#1
of 1,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87
of 449,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.