Title |
An Exploratory Study of “Selfitis” and the Development of the Selfitis Behavior Scale
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11469-017-9844-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janarthanan Balakrishnan, Mark D. Griffiths |
Abstract |
In 2014, stories appeared in national and international media claiming that the condition of "selfitis" (the obsessive taking of selfies) was to be classed as a mental disorder by the American Psychiatric Association and that the condition could be borderline, acute, or chronic. However, the stories were a hoax but this did not stop empirical research being carried out into the concept. The present study empirically explored the concept and collected data on the existence of selfitis with respect to the three alleged levels (borderline, acute, and chronic) and developed the Selfitis Behavior Scale (SBS). Initially, focus group interviews with 225 Indian university students were carried out to generate potential items for the SBS. The SBS was then validated using 400 Indian university students via exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Six factors were identified in the EFA comprising environmental enhancement, social competition, attention seeking, mood modification, self-confidence, and social conformity. The findings demonstrate that the SBS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing selfitis but that confirmatory studies are needed to validate the concept more rigorously. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 15 | 9% |
United States | 12 | 7% |
France | 9 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 5% |
Turkey | 6 | 4% |
Germany | 5 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 2% |
Mexico | 4 | 2% |
Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
Other | 31 | 18% |
Unknown | 73 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 136 | 80% |
Scientists | 21 | 12% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 13% |
Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 4% |
Other | 38 | 18% |
Unknown | 82 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 43 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 8 | 4% |
Other | 31 | 15% |
Unknown | 90 | 42% |