↓ Skip to main content

Elevating the cost of doing nothing: an interview with Mark Shafer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Elevating the cost of doing nothing: an interview with Mark Shafer
Published in
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, November 2017
DOI 10.1057/s41272-017-0130-0
Authors

Andreas Hinterhuber, Evandro Pollono, Mark Shafer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 40%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 40%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,512,854
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management
#111
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,276
of 444,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.