↓ Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Peer Network Intervention to Improve Social Communication of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Randomized Trial in Kindergarten and First Grade

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
A Comprehensive Peer Network Intervention to Improve Social Communication of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Randomized Trial in Kindergarten and First Grade
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2340-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Debra Kamps, Kathy Thiemann-Bourque, Linda Heitzman-Powell, Ilene Schwartz, Nancy Rosenberg, Rose Mason, Suzanne Cox

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized control group study was to examine the effects of a peer network intervention that included peer mediation and direct instruction for Kindergarten and First-grade children with autism spectrum disorders. Trained school staff members provided direct instruction for 56 children in the intervention group, and 39 children participated in a comparison group. Results showed children in the intervention group displayed significantly more initiations to peers than did the comparison group during non-treatment social probes and generalization probes. Treatment session data showed significant growth for total communications over baseline levels. Children in treatment also showed more growth in language and adaptive communication. Finally, teachers' ratings of prosocial skills revealed significantly greater improvements for the intervention group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 70 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 25%
Social Sciences 40 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 81 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,148,930
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#434
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,780
of 360,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.