You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glycaemic control of Type 1 diabetes in clinical practice early in the 21st century: an international comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetic Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/dme.12676 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J A McKnight, S H Wild, M J E Lamb, M N Cooper, T W Jones, E A Davis, S Hofer, M Fritsch, E Schober, J Svensson, T Almdal, R Young, J T Warner, B Delemer, P F Souchon, R W Holl, W Karges, D M Kieninger, S Tigas, A Bargiota, C Sampanis, V Cherubini, R Gesuita, I Strele, S Pildava, K J Coppell, G Magee, J G Cooper, S F Dinneen, K Eeg-Olofsson, A-M Svensson, S Gudbjornsdottir, H Veeze, H-J Aanstoot, M Khalangot, W V Tamborlane, K M Miller |
| Abstract |
Improving glycaemic control in people with Type 1 diabetes is known to reduce complications. Our aim was to compare glycaemic control among people with Type 1 diabetes using data gathered in regional or national registries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 9% |
| Malta | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,915,190
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetic Medicine
#341
of 3,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,315
of 273,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetic Medicine
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.