↓ Skip to main content

Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
Title
Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement?
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, November 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marissa K. Hartwig, John Dunlosky

Abstract

Previous studies, such as those by Kornell and Bjork (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14:219-224, 2007) and Karpicke, Butler, and Roediger (Memory, 17:471-479, 2009), have surveyed college students' use of various study strategies, including self-testing and rereading. These studies have documented that some students do use self-testing (but largely for monitoring memory) and rereading, but the researchers did not assess whether individual differences in strategy use were related to student achievement. Thus, we surveyed 324 undergraduates about their study habits as well as their college grade point average (GPA). Importantly, the survey included questions about self-testing, scheduling one's study, and a checklist of strategies commonly used by students or recommended by cognitive research. Use of self-testing and rereading were both positively associated with GPA. Scheduling of study time was also an important factor: Low performers were more likely to engage in late-night studying than were high performers; massing (vs. spacing) of study was associated with the use of fewer study strategies overall; and all students-but especially low performers-were driven by impending deadlines. Thus, self-testing, rereading, and scheduling of study play important roles in real-world student achievement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 392 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 15%
Student > Bachelor 59 15%
Student > Master 42 10%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 91 23%
Unknown 96 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 117 29%
Social Sciences 50 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 5%
Computer Science 11 3%
Other 72 18%
Unknown 110 27%