↓ Skip to main content

Proximal total splenic artery embolization for refractory hepatic encephalopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Proximal total splenic artery embolization for refractory hepatic encephalopathy
Published in
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12328-017-0805-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harufumi Maki, Junichi Kaneko, Junichi Arita, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Sumihito Tamura, Hidemasa Takao, Eisuke Shibata, Norihiro Kokudo

Abstract

A Japanese woman with a history of Kasai operation for biliary atresia had living-donor liver transplantation at the age of 22. The first episode of refractory HE and late cellular rejection was treated by a high dose of methylprednisolone. The second episode of refractory HE was treated by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for a spleno-renal shunt. However, the third episode of refractory HE occurred 11 years after liver transplantation. The liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism were present with a Child-Pugh score of C-10. Although portal vein flow was hepatopetal, superior mesenteric vein flow regurgitated. We performed proximal total splenic artery embolization (TSAE). Superior mesenteric vein flow changed to a hepatopetal direction and she became clear. At a year after proximal TSAE, her spleen volume had decreased to 589 mL (20% decrease) on computed tomography. She is well and has a Child-Pugh score of 8 without overt HE. We report the first case of refractory HE treated by proximal TSAE that is a possible less invasive treatment option for a selected patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology
#169
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,770
of 437,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.