You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tools for Assessing Outcomes in Studies of Chronic Cough CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1378/chest.14-2506 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louis-Philippe Boulet, Remy R. Coeytaux, Douglas C. McCrory, Cynthia T. French, Anne B. Chang, Surinder S. Birring, Jaclyn Smith, Rebecca L. Diekemper, Bruce Rubin, Richard S. Irwin, CHEST Expert Cough Panel, Todd M. Adams, Kenneth W. Altman, Alan F. Barker, Surinder S. Birring, Fiona Blackhall, Donald C. Bolser, Louis-Philippe Boulet, Sidney S. Braman, Christopher Brightling, Priscilla Callahan-Lyon, Anne Bernadette Chang, Remy Coeytaux, Terrie Cowley, Paul Davenport, Rebecca L. Diekemper, Satoru Ebihara, Ali A. El Solh, Patricio Escalante, Anthony Feinstein, Stephen K. Field, Dina Fisher, Cynthia T. French, Peter Gibson, Philip Gold, Michael K. Gould, Cameron Grant, Susan M. Harding, Anthony Harnden, Adam T. Hill, Richard S. Irwin, Peter J. Kahrilas, Karina A. Keogh, Andrew P. Lane, Sandra Zelman Lewis, Kaiser Lim, Mark A. Malesker, Stuart Mazzone, Douglas C. McCrory, Lorcan McGarvey, Alex Molasiotis, M. Hassan Murad, Peter Newcombe, Huong Q. Nguyen, John Oppenheimer, David Prezant, Marcos I. Restrepo, Mark Rosen, Bruce Rubin, Jay H. Ryu, Jaclyn Smith, Susan M. Tarlo, Anne Vertigan, Gang Wang, Miles Weinberger, Kelly Weir |
| Abstract |
Since the publication of the 2006 ACCP Cough Guidelines, a variety of tools has been developed or further refined for assessing cough. The purpose of the present Committee was to evaluate instruments used by investigators performing clinical research on chronic cough. The specific aims were to 1) assess the performance of tools designed to measure cough frequency, severity and/or impact in adults, adolescents, and children with chronic cough; and 2) make recommendations or suggestions related to these findings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 15% |
| Peru | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 45% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,360,154
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#3,489
of 13,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,973
of 271,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#54
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.