↓ Skip to main content

Managing Concerning Behaviors in Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain: A Delphi Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Managing Concerning Behaviors in Patients Prescribed Opioids for Chronic Pain: A Delphi Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11606-017-4211-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica S. Merlin, Sarah R. Young, Joanna L. Starrels, Soraya Azari, E. Jennifer Edelman, Jamie Pomeranz, Payel Roy, Shalini Saini, William C. Becker, Jane M. Liebschutz

Abstract

Current guideline-recommended monitoring of patients prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic pain will likely result in increased identification of behaviors of concern for misuse and addiction, but there is a dearth of empiric evidence about how these behaviors should be managed. To establish expert consensus about treatment approaches for common and challenging concerning behaviors that arise among patients on LTOT. We used a Delphi approach, which allows for generation of consensus. Participants were clinical experts in chronic pain and opioid prescribing recruited from professional societies and other expert groups. The Delphi process was conducted online, and consisted of an initial brainstorming round to identify common and challenging behaviors, a second round to identify management strategies for each behavior, and two rounds to establish consensus and explore disagreement/uncertainty. Forty-two participants completed round 1, 22 completed round 2, 30 completed round 3, and 28 completed round 4. Half of round 1 participants were female (52%), and the majority were white (83%). Most (71%) were physicians, and most participants practiced in academic primary (40%) or specialty care (19%).The most frequently cited common and challenging behaviors were missing appointments, taking opioids for symptoms other than pain, using more opioid medication than prescribed, asking for an increase in opioid dose, aggressive behavior, and alcohol and other substance use. Across behaviors, participants agreed that patient education and information gathering were important approaches. Participants also agreed that stopping opioids is not important initially, but if initial approaches do not work, tapering opioids and stopping opioids immediately may become important approaches. This study presents clinical expert consensus on how to manage concerning behaviors among patients on LTOT. Future research is needed to investigate how implementing these management strategies would impact patient outcomes, practice and policy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Other 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 21 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,392,250
of 25,252,667 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,763
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,491
of 452,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#24
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,252,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.