| Title |
The quality–quantity trade-off: evidence from the relaxation of China’s one-child policy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Population Economics, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00148-013-0478-4 |
| Authors |
Haoming Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 26% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 67 | 48% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2016.
All research outputs
#781,780
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Economics
#33
of 684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,009
of 197,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Economics
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.