↓ Skip to main content

The role of protein kinase C activation and the vascular complications of diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacological Research, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of protein kinase C activation and the vascular complications of diabetes
Published in
Pharmacological Research, May 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.phrs.2007.04.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Net Das Evcimen, George L. King

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease caused by inherited and/or acquired deficiency in production of insulin by the pancreas, and by resistance to insulin's effects. Such a deficiency results in increased concentrations of glucose and other metabolites in the blood, which in turn damages many of the body's systems, in particular the eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart and blood vessels. There are two major types of diabetes mellitus: Type 1 diabetes (insulin-dependent diabetes, IDDM or juvenile onset diabetes) and Type 2 diabetes (non-insulin-dependent diabetes, NIDDM or adult-onset). Chronic hyperglycemia is a major initiator of diabetic micro- and cardiovascular complications, such as retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy. Several hyperglycemia-induced mechanisms may induce vascular dysfunctions, which include increased polyol pathway flux, altered cellular redox state, increased formation of diacylglycerol (DAG) and the subsequent activation of protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms and accelerated non-enzymatic formation of advanced glycated end products. It is likely that each of these mechanisms may contribute to the known pathophysiologic features of diabetic complications. Others and we have shown that activation of the DAG-PKC pathway is associated with many vascular abnormalities in the retinal, renal, neural and cardiovascular tissues in diabetes mellitus. DAG-PKC pathway affects cardiovascular function in many ways, such as the regulation of endothelial permeability, vasoconstriction, extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis/turnover, cell growth, angiogenesis, cytokine activation and leucocyte adhesion, to name a few. Increased DAG levels and PKC activity, especially alpha, beta1/2 and delta isoforms in retina, aorta, heart, renal glomeruli and circulating macrophages have been reported in diabetes. Increased PKC activation have been associated with changes in blood flow, basement membrane thickening, extracellular matrix expansion, increases in vascular permeability, abnormal angiogenesis, excessive apoptosis and changes in enzymatic activity alterations such as Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase, cPLA(2), PI3Kinase and MAP kinase. Inhibition of PKC, especially the beta1/2 isoform has been reported to prevent or normalize many vascular abnormalities in the tissues described above. Clinical studies have shown that ruboxistaurin, a PKCbeta isoform selective inhibitor, normalize endothelial dysfunction, renal glomerular filtration rate and prevented loss of visual acuity in diabetic patients. Thus, PKC activation involving several isoforms is likely to be responsible for some of the pathologies in diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy and cardiovascular disease. PKC isoform selective inhibitors are likely new therapeutics, which can delay the onset or stop the progression of diabetic vascular disease with very little side effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 294 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 16%
Student > Master 47 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 13%
Researcher 26 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 71 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 7%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 80 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacological Research
#1,076
of 3,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,345
of 86,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacological Research
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.