| Title |
Lymph Node Metastasis in T4 Maxillary Sinus Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Incidence and Treatment Outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3544-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akihiro Homma, Ryuichi Hayashi, Kazuto Matsuura, Kengo Kato, Kazuyoshi Kawabata, Nobuya Monden, Yasuhisa Hasegawa, Tetsuro Onitsuka, Yasushi Fujimoto, Shigemichi Iwae, Kenji Okami, Takashi Matsuzuka, Kunitoshi Yoshino, Ken-ichi Nibu, Takakuni Kato, Hiroshi Nishino, Takahiro Asakage, Ichiro Ota, Morimasa Kitamura, Akira Kubota, Tsutomu Ueda, Kaichiro Ikebuchi, Akihito Watanabe, Masato Fujii |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of lymph node metastasis among patients with T4 maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MS-SCC) as well as the delayed metastasis rate and the treatment outcome for untreated N0 neck in patients with T4 MS-SCC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 69% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,247,117
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,484
of 6,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,933
of 224,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#65
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.